All discussionsAll discussionsUnit1You have read the copy of the U.S. Constitution I posted in the Unit.Post in this Forum as follows:1. Provide an example of any one provision (something that is written) in the Constitution that is NOT clear (ambiguous). Explain why it is not clear.2. Comment on classmate postings.Uit21. What are three differences you can identify between a Trial Court (refer to our Textbook) and Judge Cristina’s television program? [See link provided in this unit.]2. In terms of the resolution of private disputes, what purpose does Judge Cristina serve?3. Comment on classmate postings.Unit 3 Do you agree or disagree with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Kentucky v. King case (textbook, p.144)? Please explain.Unit 4Post in this Forum as follows:1. In your opinion, why is there a Law of Torts?2. Do you agree or disagree with the decision in the “McDonald’s Hot Coffee Case”?(I posted a link to this Case in the Unit) Explain your opinion..Unit 51. Do you agree or disagree with the decision in the Lambert case (p. 319, textbook). Explain by makingEXPLICIT reference to any of the principles of Contract Law (say which one(s) you are using) that are in the Chapter.Please refer to at least some principles, and cite the page number that they are on, in order to receive a satisfactory score.AnswerI agree with the trail court’s ruling because Lambertdidn’t make a clear offer, he and Barrondidn’t negotiate the terms of the offer and Barron never orally accepted his offer for consulting services under the proposed one-year arrangement with $3100 per month. (Mallor, at p. 319) A basic element of a contract was missing in this case; base on a voluntary agreement, an offer and an acceptance of that offer must be made. (Mallor, et al., at p. 318) Since the acceptancewasn’t made, there is no contract. In addition, I don’t believe that Barron had the mental capacity to accept an offer according to Lambert’s statement. Lambert stated that due to Barron’s personal problems and financial difficulties, he was concerned about his friend’s depressed mental state. (Mallor, et al., at p. 319) Another basic element of a contract is that the person must have legal capacity to contract. (Mallor, et al., at p. 318) Furthermore, due to both parties friendship prior to the unclear offer made by Lambert, it could be presumed that the advice was given freely between friends. (Mallor, et al., at p. 319) Therefore, I also agree with the court ruling that ultimately their relationship was that of a friend helping a friend. (Mallor, et al., at p. 320) Finally, Lambert did not have a case because he could not prove that he had abilateral contractwhich states that both parties must exchange promises. (Mallor, et al., at p. 320) Nor did he have anexpressed contractwhere both parties stated the terms of the oral contract. (Mallor, et al., at p. 321)Unit 6Who keeps the Engagement Ring?The Facts:Alex (“A”) proposes marriage to Barbara (“B”);B accepts;A gives B an engagement ring;After 6 months A and B get tired of each other;The engagement is broken off.Question:Who keeps the ring?1. Post your answer and explanation. Use principles you have learned in my Lecture and Text.This is not based on your opinion alone; your conclusion MUST have a basis in the Law, therefore: YOU MUST refer to the Law and legal principles (say which one(s) and where you found them PRECISELY (“in the Textbook” is not good enough)Unit 7Please visit all the links I posted in Unit 71. In the disasters you saw in the photographs, what should the buyer have insisted upon in his/her contract with regard to risk of loss? Explain. You must refer to our textbook (specific terms and page numbers) in our answer.2. What should the seller have tried to put in the contract? Explain. You must refer to our textbook (specific terms and page numbers) in your answer.3. Comment on a classmate’s posting.Unit 81. Make a Personal Statement about what you learned about Business Law in this Course and how it applies, or will apply, to you in any of your activities. 2. What was your “Wow” moment in this Course? (e.g., something surprising, or did not know before, etc.)
BUS204.94: Business Law I[MOD4 ONLINE (3/4-4/27/2013)
We offer the best custom paper writing services. We have done this question before, we can also do it for you.
- 100% non-plagiarized Papers
- 24/7 /365 Service Available
- Affordable Prices
- Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
- Will complete your papers in 6 hours
- On-time Delivery
- Money-back and Privacy guarantees
- Unlimited Amendments upon request
- Satisfaction guarantee
How It Works
- Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
- Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.