Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Response 1 Discussion 1 | Gen Paper
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Criteria Ratings Points

Management
Technique

4 to >3.0 pts

Advanced

Thread clearly specifies the
company, the industry, and the
management technique to be
analyzed

3 to >2.0 pts

Proficient

Thread clearly specifies the
company and industry but
not the technique

2 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Company
identified but
not the industry

0 pts

Not
Present

4 pts

Evaluation
Appropriateness
of Technique

12 to >10.0 pts

Advanced

Technique appropriate for
company, description
developed and includes
adequate details detailed
correlation between technique
and company

10 to >9.0 pts

Proficient

Technique described but
not in a detailed manner.
Few details and no
correlation

9 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Technique
identified but no
detail as how it
applies to
company

0 pts

Not
Present

12 pts

Synthesis Positive
Force of
Technique

12 to >10.0 pts

Advanced

Thread describes how the
technique selected will be a
positive force for the company
and provides appropriate
examples. One or two
examples provided

10 to >9.0 pts

Proficient

Description of impact of
technique to company but
incorrect examples

9 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Description of
impact of
technique to
company but no
examples

0 pts

Not
Present

12 pts

Originality Overall
Content

28 to >25.0 pts

Advanced

Thread conforms to the
instructions. Content is well
developed. Included originality
of thought. Paragraph
structure and flow is excellent.
Analysis of the technique
selected is provided.
Questions are answered
thoroughly and supported
using substantial research
data

25 to >23.0 pts

Proficient

Thread conforms to the
instructions. Content is
developed but lacks
originality of thought. Too
many direct
quotations. Paragraph
structure and flow is
excellent. Analysis of the
technique selected is
provided. Minimal research
sources used

23 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Content is
organized
based mainly
on text little
collaborating
research data

0 pts

Not
Present

28 pts

Discussion: Cost Management, Strategy, Technique Grading Rubric |
BUSI601_B02_202230

Criteria Ratings Points

Replies: New
Information

10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

Reply introduces new and
relevant information to the
discussion of management
technique

9 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

Introduces new information
with little relevance
management techniques

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Introduces new
information with
no relevance to
management
technique

0 pts

Not
Present

10 pts

Replies:
Evaluation
Research support
and originality

30 to >27.0 pts

Advanced

Synthesis of research data
Reply is well supported with
the referenced sources and
expounds on discussion of
technique

27 to >24.0 pts

Proficient

Minimum analysis of
researched data Reply
minimally referenced with
research sources

24 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Researched
provided but no
analysis of
information

0 pts

Not
Present

30 pts

Thread:
Grammar,
Spelling and APA
formatting

13 to >11.0 pts

Advanced

No grammar or spelling errors

11 to >10.0 pts

Proficient

Only one minor error and 1
APA error

10 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Two grammar
errors and at
least 2 APA
errors

0 pts

Not
Present

13 pts

Thread: Text and
Journal Support

11 to >10.0 pts

Advanced

Thread contains appropriate
word count and content
supported with text and
relevant scholarly research
data

10 to >9.0 pts

Proficient

Thread contains
appropriate word count and
content not supported with
text and relevant scholarly
research data

9 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Thread had
irrelevant
scholarly
sources and
unsubstantiated
opinion
statements

0 pts

Not
Present

11 pts

Replies:
Grammar/Spelling
and APA
formatting

20 to >17.0 pts

Advanced

No grammar or spelling errors

17 to >16.0 pts

Proficient

Only one minor error and 1
APA error

16 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Two grammar
errors and at
least 2 APA
errors

0 pts

Not
Present

20 pts

Discussion: Cost Management, Strategy, Technique Grading Rubric |
BUSI601_B02_202230

Criteria Ratings Points

Replies: Text and
Journal Support

10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

Thread contains appropriate
word count and content
supported with text and
relevant scholarly research
data

9 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

Thread contains
appropriate word count and
content not supported with
text and relevant scholarly
research data

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Thread had
irrelevant
scholarly
sources and
unsubstantiated
opinion
statements

0 pts

Not
Present

10 pts

Total Points: 150

Discussion: Cost Management, Strategy, Technique Grading Rubric |
BUSI601_B02_202230

error: Content is protected !!